Mental Health Training Traceability Matrix

🧠 Mental Health Training Traceability Matrix

Connecting Training Inputs to Population-Level Impact

Level 1: Direct Outputs
Easy to Measure • Immediate
  • Number of care workers trained
  • Certification/completion rates
  • Pre/post training scores
  • Training satisfaction ratings
  • Geographic distribution of trained workers
  • Training hours completed
Level 2: Behavioral Change
Medium Difficulty • 3-12 months
  • Screenings conducted by trained workers
  • Referrals made to professionals
  • Cases identified per worker
  • Worker confidence scores
  • Time to diagnosis (before/after)
  • Quality of case documentation
Level 3: Population Impact
Hard to Measure • 12+ months
  • Early vs. late stage diagnosis ratio
  • Severe cases reaching hospitals
  • Patient outcomes (3/6/12 months)
  • Community awareness levels
  • Mental health stigma reduction
  • Geographic coverage expansion
🔗 Bridging the Attribution Gap

1. Unique Identifiers

  • Assign each trained worker a unique ID
  • Link worker ID to all screenings/referrals
  • Maintain anonymity for patients
  • Track training date and certification level

2. Case Tracking System

  • Who identified the case (Worker ID)
  • Stage of condition at identification
  • Date of identification vs. training date
  • Follow-up outcomes at 3/6/12 months

3. Control Groups

  • Compare areas with/without trained workers
  • Cases by trained vs. untrained workers
  • Before/after in same geography
  • Similar demographic areas as control

4. Proxy Indicators

  • Early-stage to late-stage ratio
  • Average time: symptom → care
  • Community awareness surveys
  • Help-seeking behavior changes
1

0-6 Months

Track training completions

Implement case logging

Baseline surveys

2

6-18 Months

Worker follow-up surveys

Aggregate case data

Track referral outcomes

3

18+ Months

Longitudinal patient data

Cost-benefit analysis

Geographic trends

🌟 Improving Provider Lives: Building Sustainability

If you burn out or exploit care workers, the whole system collapses. Design for provider wellbeing from day one.

💰 Economic Benefits

  • Pay for training time - not just "free" training
  • Performance bonuses for quality screenings
  • Stipends for professional development
  • Clear career progression path
  • Recognized certification valued by employers

🛡️ Emotional Support

  • Regular supervision sessions with psychologists
  • Peer support groups (monthly gatherings)
  • Access to counseling for workers themselves
  • Training on self-care and boundaries
  • Clear guidelines on when to refer up

📈 Professional Growth

  • Build confidence with clear, achievable goals
  • Advanced modules after basic certification
  • Guest lectures from practitioners
  • Opportunities to co-present at workshops
  • Portfolio documentation for future jobs

🤝 Community & Voice

  • Peer networks - WhatsApp/Telegram groups
  • Mentorship pairs for guidance
  • Involve workers in program design
  • Advisory council of experienced workers
  • Annual gatherings for all trained workers

⚖️ Working Conditions

  • Realistic workloads - not exploitative
  • Time for documentation and self-care
  • Flexibility for family/multiple jobs
  • Safety protocols for outreach work
  • Clear "off hours" boundaries

📊 Provider Metrics

  • Worker satisfaction scores (quarterly)
  • Retention rates - are people staying?
  • Workers' own mental health indicators
  • Income changes over time
  • Professional advancement tracking

🎯 The Positive Feedback Loop

Workers feel supported and valued → They do better work and stay longer → Better patient outcomes → Program reputation grows → More funding → Better conditions for workers → (Loop continues)

Key: If the program improves workers' social status, earning potential, skills, and mental health - they become your best advocates and the program scales naturally.

💡 Key Insight: Correlation vs. Causation

You likely can't prove direct causation, but you can build a strong correlation case by demonstrating:

Temporal RelationshipDose-ResponseConsistency Across GroupsRuling Out Alternatives